The Politics of Fear Archive: Course Description

It is better to be feared than loved. Machiavelli

The thing I fear most is fear. Michel de Montaigne

In the twentieth century, the idea of human universality rests less on hope than on fear, less on optimism about the human capacity for good than on dread of human capacity for evil, less on a vision of man as maker of history than of man the wolf toward his own kind. Michael Ignatieff

Fear is one of the most basic and motivating of human emotions. Corey Robin, in his new book Fear: The History of a Political Idea, argues that fear is the first emotion mentioned in the Bible. Philosophers from Aristotle to Locke to Burke have seen fear as a motivating force, a means to action, without which the human populace remains passive and satiated. It can be a source of human industry or of human misery.

Political fear finds its place in the competing ideas and ideologies of our time: traditional values in opposition to modernity, religion in opposition to secularism, freedom in relation to security, globalization in relation to nationalism, etc. These are arguments that tend to be posed in an either-or polarity, often representing the Manichean struggle of good versus evil. Fear often forces societies and its citizens to choose sides and relegates complexity and ambiguity to the sidelines. Is this political manipulation or a clash of civilizations on a range of levels?

The Spanish Inquisition...The Rise of the National Socialist Party...The Red Menace and McCarthyism...The Cold War and its subsequent proxy wars...Desaparecidos... Kosovo’s Field of Blackbirds...Apartheid...Radio Milles Collines...Bharatiya Janata Party, Ayodhya and the Babri Masjid Mosque...Darfur.

Has any country gone untouched by the politics of fear? From Argentina to Bosnia to Burma to Chile to China to Iran to Iraq to Russia to Rwanda to the United States? The politics of fear has been and is pervasive in society, from the military juntas of Latin America to Mao’s Cultural Revolution to the autogenocide in Cambodia to environmental movements to the media and advertising industries.

Some argue that decades ago, the idea of collective fear had a specific source: the atom bomb. Today, our shared anxiety has become far more complex and insidious, arising from tyranny, terrorism, and the invisible power of the quasi-state.

Are the two prongs of the U.S. anti-terror strategy -- preventive war and democratization -- at odds? Can fear be used as a democratic weapon in the fight against terrorism without undermining the values of liberalism? Benjamin Barber argues that “Terror succeeds in what it promises, rather than in what it actually achieves, and so turns the effort to defend against it into its chief tool.” Are patriotism and criticism of the government mutually exclusive? Has the war on terrorism compromised the First Amendment?

To what extent, if at all, are citizens or segments of society willing to sacrifice the rule of law for security? From Italy to Uruguay? From Russia to the United States? Are fascist states only an early 20th century phenomenon or could they return? Is there a current trend in South America toward more authoritarian states? Will totalitarianism re-emerge?

What are the means for countering political fear? How do societies transition from repressive to democratic governments?